Search for: "c/o B. Strong"
Results 1 - 20
of 598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2018, 8:17 am
It was considered sad that her notes looked like this: o f w a i h h b t n t k c t w b d o e a i i i h....But then it was understood, and they realized what they were seeing and felt overwhelmed by their failure to understand her. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 10:34 am
Strong, Mandatory Arbitration of Internal Trust Disputes – Improving Arbitrability and Enforceability through Proper Procedural ChoicesLucy Greenwood & C. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 9:15 am
” The ads allegedly lead consumers to expect to receive units containing “(a) handles; (b) single-colored (gray) fronts; (c) fronts with two gray sections; (d) round edges; and (e) bases and tops that are the same size. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 7:49 am
That was chosen b/c Nike was a strong mark. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 9:14 pm
CAFC Holds PTAB Joinder Decisions Reviewable Back in March, the Windy City panel (Prost, Plager, and O’Malley) originally held that § 315(c) was unambiguous that an existing “party” to a PTAB proceeding cannot be joined as a party. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:31 am
Lastly, other categories, such as the O-1, P-1, L-1, E-1/2 and B-1, may help employers bridge the H-1B visa shortage. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 3:07 pm
Not b/c they desire to be unconstitutional, but b/c Congress keeps telling them to do things. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 12:00 pm
Please make checks payable to Rosenthal for Assembly and mail or fax your RSVP to: Rosenthal for Assembly c/o McEvoy & Associates 32 Union Square East, Suite 406 New York, NY 10003 (212) 228-7446 Ext. 10 (212) 228-7443 Fax sam@mcevoyandassociates.com [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 8:24 pm
Id.Issue(s): “Castro argues that a conviction under section 288(c)(1) does not constitute a ‘crime of violence’ warranting a sixteen-level increase under United States Sentencing Guideline § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A). [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 2:38 pm
The growing interest in enterprise self management within functionally differentiated production chains also gave rise to strong markets for substantive and procedural structures around which such private governance systems could be organized. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
New is important b/c it’s a democratic endorsement. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:43 am
No, b/c it’s competitive/cost-based market. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:02 pm
Mostly b/c of the way that computers work. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 8:04 am
It’s not b/c commercial speech isn’t as valuable, it’s b/c they don’t like the message being sent. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 6:26 pm
O’Neill. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 8:56 am
The registration was invalidated under sections 3(1)(d) (signs customary in the trade) and 3(1)(b) (lack of distinctive character), but the Hearing Officer judged it unnecessary to reach a conclusion under section 3(1)(c) (descriptiveness). [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 1:43 pm
” The SEC’s order finds that Barclays violated Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act, Securities Exchange Act Section 15(c)(3), Rules 15c3-5(c)(1)(i) and 15c3-5(b) of the SEC’s Market Access Rule, and Rules 301(b)(2) and (10). [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 10:32 am
Assault causing bodily harm is covered under s. 267(b) of the Criminal Code. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:43 pm
Louboutin is a great case b/c it’s so odd compared to the rest of US TM law. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 5:22 pm
(e) The Department of Homeland Security evaluated each country against the baseline described in subsection (c) of this section. [read post]
